Sanskrit — Language of Enlightenment — Sanskrit and the Technological Age — Knowledge Representation
Sanskrit and the Technological Age By
Vyasa Houston M. A.
But Whitehead's words are somewhat anbiguous, and may have created in readers as many different responses as there are readers. One may perceive his statement as a noble and inspiring truth. Another may react to the notion that a 'soul' could depend on language. Still another may be completely in the dark about what Whitehead is saying. The quote will actually take on meaning according to context, and the context is largely determined by the meanings we attribute to words. This is especially so in this quote for the word "soul." According to Webster, "soul" can mean "the immortal part of a human being," or "the seat of emotional sentiment and aspiration," or simply "a human being." In addition to or apart from these definitions, each of us may bring our own religious or philosophical beliefs or experiences into the context, but the point is this: wherever we go in our interpretation of Whitehead, we use language. So the question arises, "Where does the soul exist other than in language?" |
We have greatly underestimated the sacred power of language. When the power of language to create and discover life is recognized, language becomes sacred; in ancient times, language was held in this regard. Nowhere was this more so than in ancient India. It is evident that the ancient scientists of language were acutely aware of the function of language as a tool for exploring and understanding life, and their intention to discover truth was so consuming that in the process of using language with greater and greater rigor, they discovered perhaps the most perfect tool for fulfulling such a search that the world has ever known—the Sanskrit language. This, along with the example of Whitehead's quote, points out what is perhaps the most important distinction we can make in the fulfillment of our lives: either language uses us or we use language. Either we think that Whitehead is right or wrong based on what our already-established definition of "soul" is, or we discover the relation of his use of words to our own use of words, which opens the doors to the possibility of seeing something that lies beyond both. Only in the latter do we actually communicate, free from the domination of unconscious memory dictating meaning. Of all the discoveries that have occurred and developed in the course of human history, language is the most significant and probably the most taken for granted. Without language, civilization could obviously not exist. On the other hand, to the degree that language becomes sophisticated and accurate in describing the subtlety and complexity of human life, we gain power and effectiveness in meeting its challenges. The access to modern technology which has been designed to give ease, efficiency, and enjoyment in meeting our daily needs did not exist at the beginning of the century. It was made possible by accelerated advancement in the field of mathematics, a "language" which has helped us to discover the interrelationship of energy and matter with a high degree of precision. The resulting technology is evidence of the tremendous power that is unleashed simply by being able to make the finer and finer distinction that a language like mathematics affords. At the same time, humankind has fallen far behind the advancements in technology. The precarious state of political and ecological imbalance that we are now experiencing is an obvious sign of the power of technology far exceeding the power of human beings to be in control of it. It could easily be argued that we have fallen far behind the advancements in technology simply because the languages we use for daily communication do not help us to make the distinctions required to be in balance with the technology that has taken over our lives. Relevant to this,
there has recently been an astounding discovery made
at the NASA research center. The following quote is
from an article Sanskrit
& Artificial Intelligence, which appeared
in AI (Artificial Intelligence) magazine in
spring of 1985, written NASA researcher Rick Briggs:
"In the past twenty years, much time, effort,
and money has been expended on designing an unambiguous
representation of natural languages to make them accessible
to computer processing. These efforts have centered
around creating schemata designed to parallel logical
relations with relations expressed by the syntax and
semantics of natural languages, which are clearly
cumbersome and ambiguous in their function as vehicles
for the transmission of logical data. Understandably,
there is a widespread belief that natural languages
are unsuitable for the transmission of many ideas
that artificial languages can render with great precision
and mathematical rigor.
This discovery is of monumental significance. It
is mind-boggling to consider that we have available
to us a language which has been spoken for at least
3000 years that appears to be in every respect a perfect
language designed for enlightened communication. But
the most stunning aspect of the discovery is this:
NASA, the most advanced research center in the world
for cutting-edge technology, has discovered that Sanskrit,
the world's oldest spiritual language, is the only
unambiguous spoken language on the planet.
In early AI research it was discovered that in order
to clear up the inherent ambiguity of natural languages
for computer comprehension, it was necessary to utilize
semantic net systems to encode the actual meaning
of a sentence. Briggs gives the example of how a simple
sentence would be represented in a semantic net.
He further comments, "The degree to which a
semantic net (or any unambiguous nonsyntactic representation)
is cumbersome and odd-sounding in a natural language
is the degree to which that language is 'natural'
and deviates from the precise or 'artificial.' As
we shall see, there was a language (Sanskrit) spoken
among an ancient scientific community that has a deviation
of zero."
Considering Sanskrit's status as a spiritual language,
a further implication of this discovery is that the
age-old dichotomy between religion and science is
an entirely unjustified one. It is also relevant to
note that in the last decade, physicists have begun
to comment on the striking similarities between their
own discoveries and the discoveries made thousands
of years ago in India which went on to form the basis
of most Eastern religions.
Considering the high level of collaboration required
in uncovering the nature of energy and matter, it
is inconceivable that it ever could have taken place
without a common language, namely mathematics. This
is a perfect example of using a language for discovering
and designing life. The language of mathematics, being
inherently unambiguous, minimizes personal interpretation
and therefore maximizes opportunity for exploration
and discovery. The result of this is a worldwide community
of scientists working together with extraordinary
vitality and excitement about uncovering the unknown.
It can also be inferred that the discoveries that
occurred in India in the first millennia B.C. were
also the result of collaboration and inquiry by a
community of spiritual scientists utilizing a common
scientific language, Sanskrit. The truth of this is
further accented by the fact that throughout the history
and development of Indian thought, the science of
grammar and linguistics was attributed a status equal
to that of mathematics in the context of modern scientific
investigation. In deference to the thoroughness and
depth with which the ancient grammatical scientists
established the science of language, modern linguistic
researchers in Russia have concluded about Sanskrit,
"The time has come to continue the tradition
of the ancient grammarians on the basis of the modern
ideas in general linguistics."
Sanskrit is the most ancient of all languages. From
its sisters, Latin and Greek, most of the modern European
languages have been derived. Sanskrit use can be traced
as far back as before the first millennia B.C.; the
only preserved language to which Sanskrit was originally
related is Vedic. The oldest extant example of the
literature of the Vedic period is the Rig-Veda. Being
strictly in verse, the Rig-Veda does not give us a
record of the contemporary spoken language. Still
it is believed that Vedic coexisted with Sanskrit
originally as a living language.
The term "Vedic Sanskrit" is more appropriate
to later Vedic prose which exhibits features that
imply the influence of Sanskrit. The very name "Sanskrit"
meant "language brought to formal perfection"
in contrast to the common languages, or "natural"
languages (Prakrita).
Although there existed an older form of Sanskrit
utilized in epic literature—namely the Ramayana
and Mahabharata—which was slightly less strict
in its grammatical codification, the form of Sanskrit
which has been used for the last 2500 years is known
today as classical Sanskrit. The norms of classical
Sanskrit were established by the ancient grammarians.
Although no records are available of their work, their
efforts reached a climax in the fifth or fourth century
B.C. in the great grammatical treatise of Panini,
which became the standard for correct speech with
such comprehensive authority that it has remained
so with little alteration until present times. Based
on what the grammarians themselves have stated, we
may conclude that the Sanskrit grammar was an attempt
to discipline and explain a spoken language. The NASA
article corroborates this in saying that Indian grammatical
analysis "probably has to do with an age-old
Indo-Aryan preoccupation to discover the nature of
reality behind the impressions we human beings receive
through the operation of our senses."
Until 1100 A.D., Sanskrit was without interruption
the official language of the whole of India. The dominance
of Sanskrit is indicated by a wealth of literature
of widely diverse genres including religious, philosophical,
fiction (short stories, fables, novels, and plays);
scientific (linguistics, mathematics, astronomy, and
medicine), as well as law and politics.
From the time of the Muslim invasions onwards, Sanskrit
gradually became displaced by common languages patronized
by the Muslim kings as a tactic to suppress Indian
cultural and religious tradition and supplant it with
their own beliefs. But they could not eliminate the
literary and spiritual/ritual use of Sanskrit. Even
today in India, there is a strong movement to return
Sanskrit to the status of "the national language
of India." Sanskrit, being a language derived
from simple monosyllabic verbal roots through the
addition of appropriate prefixes and suffixes according
to precise grammatical laws, has an infinite capacity
to grow, adapt, and expand according to the requirements
of change in a rapidly evolving world.
Even in the last two centuries, due to the rapid
advances in technology and science, a literature abundant
with new and improvised vocabulary has come into existence.
Although such additions are based on the grammatical
principles of Sanskrit, and mostly composed of Sanskrit
roots, still contributions from Hindi and other national
and international languages have been assimilated.
For example, the word for television, duradarshanam,
meaning "that which provides a 'vision' of what
is far away" is derived purely from Sanskrit;
whereas the word for motorcar, motaryanam,
borrows from the English.
Furthermore, there are at least a dozen periodicals
published in Sanskrit, all-India news broadcast in
Sanskrit, television shows and feature movies produced
in Sanskrit, one village of 3000 inhabitants who communicate
through Sanskrit alone (not to mention countless smaller
intellectual communities throughout India), and schools
where Sanskrit is fostered. "Contemporary Sanskrit"
is alive and well.
Although the Muslim invasion seems to be the ostensible
historical cause of the decline of Sanskrit as the
lingua franca of India from 1100 A.D., it seems important
in the context of this article to consider some other
possibilities. By the great body of philosophical,
religious, literary, scientific, and linguistic knowledge
that was held by succeeding generations with increasing
reverence, the qualifications for being a learned
man became more and more consuming, especially considering
the great emphasis in Indian culture on the memorization
of entire texts. This fact could easily have contributed
to the decline of Sanskrit as a language tool for
the discovery of the nature of reality, which was
the real source of its own perfecting.
Apart from historical contexts there is one obvious
explanation for Sanskrit's decrease in popular use.
Its function gradually became more and more mechanical
as its practice increasingly served the purpose of
only reviewing the discoveries of the past. When the
esteem for knowledge as the mastery of what had already
been learned replaced the thirst for new discovery,
the widespread usage of Sanskrit declined. At the
same time, this need not imply any detraction from
the value and inspiration derived from a thorough
knowledge of the great works of antiquity; it only
helps to explain the decline of Sanskrit as a living
language. But the striking lesson to be learned from
the example of Sanskrit may be well worth the 2000
years it has taken. The attempt to recapture the truths
discovered by the ancient Sanskrit explorers by the
mere repetitions of their formulas actually may have
destroyed the spirit of investigation and ended up
dulling the language instrument. If this were not
so, there is no imaginable reason for the discontinuation
of such a perfect language as the lingua franca of
India or its utilization by other civilizations throughout
the world. The benefits which a language like mathematics
affords in scientific investigation, or even English
in economic advancement, are today sought from every
corner of the globe. Therefore the consideration of
what might bring Sanskrit to life as possibly the
most valuable tool we have for optimum global communication
and spiritual unity requires that we learn from the
miscalculations of the past.
The linguistic perfection of Sans-krit offers only
a partial explanation for its sustained presence in
the world for at least 3,000 years. High precision
in and of itself is of limited scope; like mathematics,
it generally excites the brain, but not the heart.
Like music, however, Sans-krit has the power to uplift
the heart. It's conceivable that for a few rare and
inspired geniuses, mathematics can reach the point
of becoming music or music, mathematics.
The extraordinary thing is that it offers direct
accessibility to anyone to that elevated plane where
the two—mathematics and music, brain and heart,
analytical and intuitive, scientific and spiritual—become
one. Great discoveries occur, whether through mathematics
or music or Sans-krit, not by the calculations or
manipulations of the human mind, but where the living
language is expressed and heard in a state of joy
and communion with the natural laws of existence.
Generating clarity and inspiration, the Sans-krit
language is directly responsible for a brilliance
of creative expression such as the world has rarely
seen. No one has expressed this more eloquently than
Sri Aurobindo, the twentieth-century poet-philosopher:
"The ancient and classical creations of the
Sans-krit tongue both in quality and in body and abundance
of excellence, in their potent originality and force
and beauty, in their substance and art and structure,
in grandeur and justice and charm of speech, and in
the height and width of the reach of their spirit,
stand very evidently in the front rank among the world's
great literatures. The language itself, as has been
universally recognized by those competent to form
a judgement, is one of the most magnificent, most
perfect, and wonderfully sufficient literary instruments
developed by the human mind, at once majestic and
sweet and flexible, strong and clearly-formed, and
full and vibrant and subtle, and its quality and character
would be of itself a sufficient evidence of the character
and quality of the race whose mind it expressed, and
the culture of which it was the reflecting medium."
Sans-krit is the language of mantra—words
of power that are subtly attuned to the unseen harmonies
of the matrix of creation, the world as yet unformed.
Vak (speech), the "word" of Genesis,
incorporates both the sense of voice and word.
It has four forms of expression. The first, para,
represents cosmic ideation arising from absolute divine
presence. The second, pasyanti (seeing), is
vak as subject, seeing which creates the object
of madhyama-vak, the third and subtle form
of speech before it manifests as vaikhari-vak,
the gross production of letters in spoken speech.
This implies the possibility of having speech oriented
to a direct living truth which transcends individual
preoccupation with the limited information available
through the senses. Spoken words as such are creative
living things of power. They penetrate to the essence
of what they describe, and give birth to meaning which
reflects the profound interrelatedness of life.
Although it is a tantalizing proposition to consider
speaking a language whose sounds are so pure and euphonically
combined, the basic attitude towards learning Sans-krit
in India today is "It's too difficult."
Actually it is not difficult, and there are few greater
enjoyments than learning it. The first stage is to
experience the individual power of each of the 49
basic sounds of the alphabet. This is pure discovery,
especially for Westerners who have never paid attention
to the unique distinctions of individual letters such
as location of resonance and position of the tongue.
It is arranged on a thoroughly scientific method,
the simple vowels (short and long) coming first, then
the diphthongs, followed by the consonants in uniform
groups according to the way in which they are pronounced.
The unique organization of the alphabet serves to
focus one's attention on qualities and patterns of
articulated sound in a way that occurs in no other
language. By paying continuous attention to the point
of location, degree of resonance, and effort of breath,
one's awareness becomes more and more consumed by
the direct experience of articulated sound. This in
itself produces an unprecedented clarity of mind and
revelry in the joy of language, as every combination
of sound follows strict laws which essentially make
possible an uninterrupted flow of the most perfect
euphonic blending of letters into words and verse.
The script used is known as devanagari or
the "city of the gods." The phonetic accuracy
of devanagari compares well with that of the
modern phonetic transcriptions. Once the alphabet
is learned, there is just one major step to take in
gaining access to this unique language: learning the
case and tense endings. The endings are what make
Sans-krit a language of mathematic-like precision.
By the endings added onto nouns or verbs, there is
an obvious determination of the precise interrelationship
of words describing the activity of persons and things
in time and space, regardless of word order. Essentially,
the endings constitute the "software" of
the basic program of the language, and once a pattern
has been noted, it is a simple exercise to recognize
all the individual instances that fit the pattern
rather than see the pattern after all the individual
instances have been learned.
Learning the case endings through the chanting of
basic pure sound combinations in musical and rhythmic
sequences is a perfect way to overcome learning inhibitions,
attune to the root power of this language, and access
the natural computer-like efficiency, speed, and clarity
of the mind. What may be the greatest immediate benefit
of learning by this method is that it requires participants
to relinquish control, abandon prior learning structures,
and come into a direct experience of the language.
But one thing is certain — Sans-krit will only
become the planetary language when it is taught in
a way which is exciting and enjoyable.
Vyaas Houston has dedicated his life to teaching
Sans-krit, and he has developed a technique that makes
it easy and natural.
1. The Mother on Sans-krit by Sri Aurobindo Society, Pondicherry, India. 2. A History of Sans-krit Literature by Arthur A. MacDonnell, M.A., Ph.D., Motilal Banarsidas, Delhi, 1962. 3. A Short History of Sans-krit Literature by H. R. Aggarwal, M.A., P.E.S., R.D.E., Munshi Ram Manohar Lal, Delhi, 1963. 4. A Companion to Contemporary Sans-krit by Hajime Nakamura, Motilal Banarsidas, Delhi, 1973. 5. Sans-krit by V. V. Ivanov and V. N. Toporov, Nauka Publishing House, Moscow, 1968.
Artificial Intelligence — Computerized Gods — The Age of Information — Weizenbaum |